|
| | | 
Rare Member
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 7/23/2010 9:12:23 AM
Posts: 530, Visits: 2,307 |
| new idea is too make tribal battlegear like underworlders could have a fire version of riverland star and mipedians could have a battlegear that gives them an additional invisiblity 5 and then generic creatures can use any of them
feedback would be appreciated |
| |
| | | 
Common Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 7/27/2010 8:03:12 AM
Posts: 60, Visits: 43 |
| I think there are 9 tribal gear as of right now.
Whepcrack
Mipedian Cactus
Riverland Star
Talisman of the mandiblor
Dread Tread
Hornsabre
Crown of aa'une
Warriors of Owayki
Scepter of the infernal parasite |
| |
| | | 
Tribe Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/5/2010 1:01:54 PM
Posts: 12,959, Visits: 5,851 |
| | They won't make Tribal BattleGear, but as Astrum pointed out, there are already Legendary, Loyal-Tribal BattleGear. I can't imagine they'd do "BattleGear-UnderWorld, Lava Pond Blade, Deal 5 Damage to Target Creature with every Fire attack the Equipped Creature plays." |
| |
| | |
Rare Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 7/23/2010 9:12:23 AM
Posts: 530, Visits: 2,307 |
| | i mean they should have battlegear that is the color of the tribe for tribal battlegear |
| |
| | |
Tribe Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/5/2010 1:01:54 PM
Posts: 12,959, Visits: 5,851 |
| | That's what I'm saying, they won't make Tribal BattleGear, only "Loyal-Tribe" ones...Besides, coloring a BattleGear Red might make someone think it's a Creature.... |
| |
| | |
Rare Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 7/23/2010 9:12:23 AM
Posts: 530, Visits: 2,307 |
| | why would they think its a creature??? it wont even have stats |
| |
| | |
Tribe Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/5/2010 1:01:54 PM
Posts: 12,959, Visits: 5,851 |
| | The color....You might get a Red Card and think it's a Misprint, for all I know, then we'll have tons of Topics, "Why is BattleGear Red?" |
| |
| | |
Rare Member
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 7/23/2010 9:12:23 AM
Posts: 530, Visits: 2,307 |
| | it would be part of the new set. so no one would think it would be a misprint |
| |
|
|